Prediction of Maddison Inglis [132nd] vs Su Jeong Jang [257th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W L
Form
L L W L W L L W L LH2H: Inglis 1 - 0 Jang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Jang winning 0. The last match between Inglis and Jang was at the W25 Osaka, 14-04-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | 1 |
| Su Jeong Jang | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Su Jeong Jang
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:30:0 | Average Match Time | 2:30:0 |
| 57% (44/77) | 1st Serve % | 68% (54/80) |
| 68% (30/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (37/54) |
| 61% (20/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (10/26) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 41% (33/80) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maddison Inglis vs Su Jeong Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Inglis 1 - 0 Jang
Editorial Prediction:
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Erika Andreeva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maddison Inglis
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Aoi Ito
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Jennifer Jackson
41%
(
26 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
8
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
77 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
57 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Su Jeong Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zongyu Li
Player
Su Jeong Jang
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
3
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Hanyu Guo
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Su Jeong Jang
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Su Jeong Jang
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(1) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Xinxin Yao
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Su Jeong Jang
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (293/197) | Win/Loss | 59% (435/299) |
| 58% (656/469) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (969/723) |
| 53% (5449/4762) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8248/7157) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 739 | Aces Total | 607 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1305 | Total Double Faults | 1437 |
| 1:28:10 | Average Match Time | 1:12:45 |
| 443.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 532.86 |
| 65% (18158/27741) | 1st Serve % | 69% (22102/31968) |
| 63% (11374/18158) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (13477/22102) |
| 47% (4469/9583) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4408/9866) |
| 48% (1670/3487) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2086/4297) |
| 45% (12939/28697) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15456/32939) |
| 60% (289/479) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (431/728) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 65% (62/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (70/129) |
| 53% (80/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (123/224) |
| 85% (289/247) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (404/357) |
| 15% (289/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (404/47) |
| 23% (201/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (330/77) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
